spring是如何實現聲明式事務的
前言
今天我們來講講spring的聲明式事務。
開始
說到聲明式事務,我們現在回顧一下事務這個概念,什麼是事務呢,事務指的是邏輯上的⼀組操作,組成這組操作的各個單元,要麼全部成功,要麼全部不成功。從而確保瞭數據的準確與安全。事務有著四大特性(ACID),分別是
原子性(Atomicity)原⼦性是指事務是⼀個不可分割的⼯作單位,事務中的操作要麼都發⽣,要麼都不發⽣。
⼀致性(Consistency)事務必須使數據庫從⼀個⼀致性狀態變換到另外⼀個⼀致性狀態。
隔離性(Isolation)事務的隔離性是多個⽤戶並發訪問數據庫時,數據庫為每⼀個⽤戶開啟的事務,每個事務不能被其他事務的操作數據所⼲擾,多個並發事務之間要相互隔離。
持久性(Durability) 持久性是指⼀個事務⼀旦被提交,它對數據庫中數據的改變就是永久性的,接下來即使數據庫發⽣故障
也不應該對其有任何影響。
在spring中,一共有兩種方式可以實現事務控制,分別是編程式事務和聲明式事務。編程式事務指的是在代碼中添加事務控制代碼,而聲明式事務指的是利用xml或者註解的形式來配置控制事務,下面就以純註解配置聲明式事務為例進行剖析。
spring開啟聲明式事務的註解是@EnableTransactionManagement,講到這裡首先要明白一點,spring的事務管理器管理事務其實就是利用aop的方式,通過創建動態代理加上攔截,實現的事務管理。在spring的配置類中加上這個註解,就支持瞭聲明式事務,那麼spring是怎麼通過這麼一個註解就可以支持事務的呢,我們來看代碼。
首先我們看到,在這個註解上,import瞭一個selector
@Import(TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector.class)
我們看這個selector類中的這麼一段代碼
@Override protected String[] selectImports(AdviceMode adviceMode) { switch (adviceMode) { case PROXY: return new String[] {AutoProxyRegistrar.class.getName(), ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration.class.getName()}; case ASPECTJ: return new String[] {determineTransactionAspectClass()}; default: return null; } }
這段代碼中,引入瞭AutoProxyRegistrar和ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration這兩個類,我們先來看AutoProxyRegistrar這個類,這個類中有一段這樣的代碼
if (mode == AdviceMode.PROXY) { //重要的是這句代碼 AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(registry); if ((Boolean) proxyTargetClass) { AopConfigUtils.forceAutoProxyCreatorToUseClassProxying(registry); return; } } //我們進到這個方法中 @Nullable public static BeanDefinition registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary( BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, @Nullable Object source) { //可以看到引入瞭InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator這個類,那麼這個類又是什麼呢 return registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class, registry, source); } //先看一下 public class InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator extends AbstractAdvisorAutoProxyCreator { @Nullable private ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory; @Override protected void initBeanFactory(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) { super.initBeanFactory(beanFactory); this.beanFactory = beanFactory; } @Override protected boolean isEligibleAdvisorBean(String beanName) { return (this.beanFactory != null && this.beanFactory.containsBeanDefinition(beanName) && this.beanFactory.getBeanDefinition(beanName).getRole() == BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE); } }
看一下繼承結構圖
可以看到這個方法間接繼承於SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor,最終繼承於BeanPostProcessor,這說明InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator類是一個後置處理器,並且跟 spring AOP 開啟@EnableAspectJAutoProxy 時註冊的AnnotationAwareAspectJProxyCreator實現的是同⼀個接口,這也對應瞭我之前所說聲明式事務是springAOP思想的一種應用。
然後我們回過頭來再看ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration這個類,我們看到其中有一個事務增強器,一個屬性解析器和是一個事務攔截器
@Bean(name = TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ADVISOR_BEAN_NAME) @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE) public BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor transactionAdvisor( TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource, TransactionInterceptor transactionInterceptor) { // 事務增強器 BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor advisor = new BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor(); // 註入屬性解析器 advisor.setTransactionAttributeSource(transactionAttributeSource); // 註入事務攔截器 advisor.setAdvice(transactionInterceptor); if (this.enableTx != null) { advisor.setOrder(this.enableTx.<Integer>getNumber("order")); } return advisor; } @Bean @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE) // 屬性解析器 public TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource() { return new AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource(); } @Bean @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE) // 事務攔截器 public TransactionInterceptor transactionInterceptor(TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource) { TransactionInterceptor interceptor = new TransactionInterceptor(); interceptor.setTransactionAttributeSource(transactionAttributeSource); if (this.txManager != null) { interceptor.setTransactionManager(this.txManager); } return interceptor; }
先看看屬性解析器
//註解解析器集合 private final Set<TransactionAnnotationParser> annotationParsers;
這是一個註解解析器的集合,可以添加多種註解解析器,在這裡我們主要關註的是spring事務註解解析器SpringTransactionParser,看一下相關代碼
protected TransactionAttribute parseTransactionAnnotation(AnnotationAttributes attributes) { RuleBasedTransactionAttribute rbta = new RuleBasedTransactionAttribute(); // 對應Transaction註解的相關屬性 Propagation propagation = attributes.getEnum("propagation"); rbta.setPropagationBehavior(propagation.value()); Isolation isolation = attributes.getEnum("isolation"); rbta.setIsolationLevel(isolation.value()); rbta.setTimeout(attributes.getNumber("timeout").intValue()); rbta.setReadOnly(attributes.getBoolean("readOnly")); rbta.setQualifier(attributes.getString("value")); List<RollbackRuleAttribute> rollbackRules = new ArrayList<>(); for (Class<?> rbRule : attributes.getClassArray("rollbackFor")) { rollbackRules.add(new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule)); } for (String rbRule : attributes.getStringArray("rollbackForClassName")) { rollbackRules.add(new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule)); } for (Class<?> rbRule : attributes.getClassArray("noRollbackFor")) { rollbackRules.add(new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule)); } for (String rbRule : attributes.getStringArray("noRollbackForClassName")) { rollbackRules.add(new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule)); } rbta.setRollbackRules(rollbackRules); return rbta; }
可以看到這段代碼中的Enum和ClassArray其實正是@Transaction註解中的相關屬性,這個屬性解析器的作用之一就是用來解析@Transaction註解中的屬性
看完瞭屬性解析器,我們接下來看事務攔截器TransactionInterceptor,其中重要的是這段代碼
@Override @Nullable public Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable { // Work out the target class: may be {@code null}. // The TransactionAttributeSource should be passed the target class // as well as the method, which may be from an interface. Class<?> targetClass = (invocation.getThis() != null ? AopUtils.getTargetClass(invocation.getThis()) : null); // Adapt to TransactionAspectSupport's invokeWithinTransaction... // 增加事務支持 return invokeWithinTransaction(invocation.getMethod(), targetClass, invocation::proceed); }
然後我們進到這個方法裡面
@Nullable protected Object invokeWithinTransaction(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass, final InvocationCallback invocation) throws Throwable { // If the transaction attribute is null, the method is non-transactional. // 獲取屬性解析器,在配置類ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration配置時加入 TransactionAttributeSource tas = getTransactionAttributeSource(); final TransactionAttribute txAttr = (tas != null ? tas.getTransactionAttribute(method, targetClass) : null); final TransactionManager tm = determineTransactionManager(txAttr); if (this.reactiveAdapterRegistry != null && tm instanceof ReactiveTransactionManager) { ReactiveTransactionSupport txSupport = this.transactionSupportCache.computeIfAbsent(method, key -> { if (KotlinDetector.isKotlinType(method.getDeclaringClass()) && KotlinDelegate.isSuspend(method)) { throw new TransactionUsageException( "Unsupported annotated transaction on suspending function detected: " + method + ". Use TransactionalOperator.transactional extensions instead."); } ReactiveAdapter adapter = this.reactiveAdapterRegistry.getAdapter(method.getReturnType()); if (adapter == null) { throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot apply reactive transaction to non-reactive return type: " + method.getReturnType()); } return new ReactiveTransactionSupport(adapter); }); return txSupport.invokeWithinTransaction( method, targetClass, invocation, txAttr, (ReactiveTransactionManager) tm); } // 獲取事務管理器 PlatformTransactionManager ptm = asPlatformTransactionManager(tm); final String joinpointIdentification = methodIdentification(method, targetClass, txAttr); if (txAttr == null || !(ptm instanceof CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager)) { // Standard transaction demarcation with getTransaction and commit/rollback calls. TransactionInfo txInfo = createTransactionIfNecessary(ptm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification); Object retVal; try { // This is an around advice: Invoke the next interceptor in the chain. // This will normally result in a target object being invoked. retVal = invocation.proceedWithInvocation(); } catch (Throwable ex) { // target invocation exception // 目標方法拋異常,會執行回滾的操作 completeTransactionAfterThrowing(txInfo, ex); throw ex; } finally { cleanupTransactionInfo(txInfo); } if (vavrPresent && VavrDelegate.isVavrTry(retVal)) { // Set rollback-only in case of Vavr failure matching our rollback rules... TransactionStatus status = txInfo.getTransactionStatus(); if (status != null && txAttr != null) { retVal = VavrDelegate.evaluateTryFailure(retVal, txAttr, status); } } // 目標方法正常運行,會執行commitTransactionAfterReturning,執行事務提交操作 commitTransactionAfterReturning(txInfo); return retVal; } else { final ThrowableHolder throwableHolder = new ThrowableHolder(); // It's a CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager: pass a TransactionCallback in. try { Object result = ((CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager) ptm).execute(txAttr, status -> { TransactionInfo txInfo = prepareTransactionInfo(ptm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification, status); try { Object retVal = invocation.proceedWithInvocation(); if (vavrPresent && VavrDelegate.isVavrTry(retVal)) { // Set rollback-only in case of Vavr failure matching our rollback rules... retVal = VavrDelegate.evaluateTryFailure(retVal, txAttr, status); } return retVal; } catch (Throwable ex) { if (txAttr.rollbackOn(ex)) { // A RuntimeException: will lead to a rollback. if (ex instanceof RuntimeException) { throw (RuntimeException) ex; } else { throw new ThrowableHolderException(ex); } } else { // A normal return value: will lead to a commit. throwableHolder.throwable = ex; return null; } } finally { cleanupTransactionInfo(txInfo); } }); // Check result state: It might indicate a Throwable to rethrow. if (throwableHolder.throwable != null) { throw throwableHolder.throwable; } return result; } catch (ThrowableHolderException ex) { throw ex.getCause(); } catch (TransactionSystemException ex2) { if (throwableHolder.throwable != null) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by commit exception", throwableHolder.throwable); ex2.initApplicationException(throwableHolder.throwable); } throw ex2; } catch (Throwable ex2) { if (throwableHolder.throwable != null) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by commit exception", throwableHolder.throwable); } throw ex2; } } }
總結
總體來說,spring實現聲明式事務的過程是這樣的
- @EnableTransactionManagement 註解,通過@import引⼊瞭TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector類,它的selectImports⽅法導⼊瞭另外兩個類:AutoProxyRegistrar和ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration
- AutoProxyRegistrar類中方法registerBeanDefinitions中,通過 AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(registry)引⼊InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator,是一個後置處理器類
- ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration 是⼀個添加瞭@Configuration註解的配置類,註冊瞭事務增強器(註⼊屬性解析器、事務攔截器)AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource和TransactionInterceptor,AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource內部持有瞭⼀個解析器集合 Set annotationParsers,具體使⽤的是SpringTransactionAnnotationParser解析器,用來解析@Transactional的事務屬性,事務攔截器TransactionInterceptor實現瞭MethodInterceptor接⼝,該通用攔截會在產⽣代理對象之前和aop增強合並,最終⼀起影響到代理對象,TransactionInterceptor的invoke⽅法中invokeWithinTransaction會觸發原有業務邏輯調用(增強事務)
到此這篇關於spring是如何實現聲明式事務的的文章就介紹到這瞭,更多相關spring 聲明式事務內容請搜索WalkonNet以前的文章或繼續瀏覽下面的相關文章希望大傢以後多多支持WalkonNet!
推薦閱讀:
- None Found